The Making of Modern Africa Final Exam Assignment

The Making of Modern Africa Final Exam - Assignment Example The industrial revolution of Europe and North Africa needed raw materials to fuel its growth. Through the vast resources within the African continent, European powers could obtain sufficient resources to cater to the needs of the Industrial revolution2. Inevitably in 1884 the Berlin Conference took place in order to determine how 13 European Nations and the United States could impose its rule on 50 African nations2. Consequentially, the Berlin Conference resulted in the partition of Africa without regard to issues such as Nationalisation, language, culture and other unifying factors2. The two most dominant colonial powers after the scramble and partition of Africa were France and Britain. The two powers were driven by several political, social and economic reasons for colonialism in colonial Africa. The European patriots were driven be the desire to colonize distant lands for the grandeur of their country’s3. One particular example is the conquest by Britain’s Cecil John Rhodes’. The British explorer was able to yield a huge chunk of central Africa for the honour of his king. Khapoya observes that through the scientific knowledge collected by geographers, European powers were able to determine if a certain area was worth laying claim to3. Great Britain used its naval and military advantage to secure Egypt, part of Sudan, Somaliland, British East Africa and most of southern African region4. Tvedt argues that British conquest of Egypt was essentially hydrological and related to Nile control upstream coupled with the beneï ¬ t of British economic interests in Egypt3.This British Nile Imperialism sparked British advances into tropical Africa from Egypt and further enhanced the Nation’s commercial expansion to other regions. The British understood the river system of the Nile and the commercial benefits accrued to this region. Therefore, driven by economic and political

Dq-7.1-Terence Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Dq-7.1-Terence - Coursework Example (1)What are the advantages? The new approach that many software developers are adapting today that entails parallel working among programmers has many advantages. Programmers that work in parallel when developing software can easily compare the algorithms they have concern the developments they are making. Making comparisons is important since it enables the programmers develop a system that is too fine enough to avoid minor breakdowns (Dingsà ¸yr, Nerur, & Moe, 2012). In the same way, this working model enables system developers to benefit from their colleagues in different ways. For example, one system developer can take advantage of his or her counterpart’s expertise. In this case, the less experienced worker is going to acquire tips and important knowledge from the colleague assigned to him/her. When programmers get to work in parallel, they save a lot of time for the organization they are serving. Instead of spending a lot of time working separately then combining their pieces of work later on, the programmers can just work together at the same time. The clients being served here are assured of being served instantly in some cases. Management of the software development program is also made easier by the approach of having parallel software developers. In this case, the supervisors of the projects are not compelled to supervise all the programmers’ work one after the other. The management of the project is always concerned about the quality of software that has been developed by the programming activity. There is little time that is spent on management of this activity when the process is done using the parallel approach (Ajimatanrareje, Shaw, & Pucci, 2014). The new approach of parallel working among software developers is important to any organization that is concerned about the software used I its operations. However, this approach may also have negative effects with the management is